Jump to navigation

The University of Texas at Austin logo The University of Texas logo
The Cockrell School of Engineering logo The Cockrell School of Engineering logo

Dr. Ruoff's team's paper cited as most downloaded

 
Shown from left to right: Jeffrey Potts, Ji Won Suk, Shanthi Murali, Rod Ruoff, Yanwu Zhu, and Weiwei Cai. Coauthor not shown in photo: Dr. Xuesong Li, now at the IBM TJ Watson Research Center.

Shown from left to right: Jeffrey Potts, Ji Won Suk, Shanthi Murali, Rod Ruoff, Yanwu Zhu, and Weiwei Cai. Coauthor not shown in photo: Dr. Xuesong Li, now at the IBM TJ Watson Research Center.

 

AUSTIN, TEXAS—September 29, 2010

Professor Rodney Ruoff's team's paper titled Graphene and Graphene Oxide: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications, was cited as the most downloaded paper from Advanced Materials over July 2010. This paper was co-authored by Yanwu Zhu, Shanthi Murali, Weiwei Cai, Xuesong Li, Ji Won Suk, Jeffrey Potts and Rodney Ruoff. Download the paper (1.9MB PDF file).

Abstract

There is intense interest in graphene in fields such as physics, chemistry, and materials science, among others. Interest in graphene's exceptional physical properties, chemical tunability, and potential for applications has generated thousands of publications and an accelerating pace of research, making review of such research timely. This paper provides an overview of the synthesis, properties, and applications of graphene and related materials (primarily, graphite oxide and its colloidal suspensions and materials made from them), from a materials science perspective.

Related Work

In another article written by Mr. Mark Wilson about work closely related to pioneering research by Professor Ruoff's team, that was published in Physics Today, a publication of the American Institute of Physics, Professor Ruoff is extensively quoted. Ruoff's team published a paper in Science in 2009 about large area growth of monolayer graphene on Cu foils. A team in South Korea at Sungkyunkwan University used this growth method but scaled it to 16 inch x 24 inch pieces of graphene, thus further demonstrating the potential for commercial use of this remarkable new material. Explanations of key terms have been provided in blue, and were not part of the original article. Abbreviations and element names have a dotted underline and can be read by mouseover. The article is ©2010 of the American Institute of Physics and may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Institute of Physics.

Graphene production goes industrial

By Mark Wilson, Physics Today

A single plane of carbon atoms, graphene was isolated in 2004 through a method that could hardly be more low-tech: The University of Manchester's Andrey Geim and colleagues used common cellophane tape to peel off weakly bound layers from bulk graphite. Once gently rubbed onto an oxidized silicon surface, the rare graphene flakes were then spotted among macroscopically [can be viewed without using a microscope] thick graphite pieces in the interference patterns of an optical microscope image. Because it yields nearly defect-free crystals, that time-consuming process has largely remained the method of choice, particularly among researchers exploring the material's astonishing two-dimensional electron-gas physics (see the article by Geim and Allan MacDonald in PHYSICS TODAY, August 2007, page 35).

Despite the material's low-tech beginnings, much of its allure lies in the advantages it brings to high-tech applications. Graphene can sustain current densities [a measure of the density of flow of conserved electric charge] a million times higher than copper, exhibits record strength and thermal conductivity, is impermeable to gases, is 97% transparent at optical frequencies, and can be elastically stretched by as much as 20%. [1]

The challenge of harnessing such rich properties —in a solar cell or a tough, but flexible touch screen, say—lies in synthesizing a continuous graphene sheet large enough and conductive enough. Unfortunately, exfoliating a chunk of graphite isn't a scalable technique—at least for making high-quality (low-resistance) graphene films. One promising approach is to epitaxially [Epitaxy refers to the method of depositing a monocrystalline film on a monocrystalline substrate] grow a graphene layer atop some other crystal. Once the epitaxial layer has cooled, the underlying crystal can then be chemically etched away.

Two years ago, three independent groups—one led by University of Houston's Qingkai Yu and Purdue University's Yong Chen, another by MIT's Jing Kong, and a third by Byung Hee Hong of Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU) in South Korea—did just that, using chemical vapor deposition of methane to catalyze the growth of a few layers (typically less than 10) of graphene on polycrystalline nickel. The graphene was then patterned lithographically or transferred onto square-centimeter wafers of glass, Si, or plastic. [2] The high solubility of carbon in Ni, however, led to wide variations in the graphene's thickness, a problem the researchers could only ameliorate by rapidly cooling the samples and restricting themselves to thin Ni films.

Shortly thereafter, Rodney Ruoff and colleagues at The University of Texas at Austin solved the problem by replacing Ni with Cu foil, whose carbon solubility is negligible. [3] The replacement allowed them to grow a single layer of graphene over 95% of a 3-cm2 Cu surface.

Hong's group, in close collaboration with Samsung (which manages SKKU), has now adapted that Cu-based chemical-vapor-deposition growth to a scalable, industrial manufacturing process, as outlined in figure 1. The researchers also chemically doped their graphene film, which increased its conductivity by a factor of four. [4] As proof of principle, they produced a 76-cm-diameter electrode whose conductivity and transparency surpass those of the commercial standard, indium tin oxide, a material that's expensive and brittle but common in touch screens and computer monitors.

The flexibility of the Cu foil and graphene make both potentially amenable to an automated roll-to-roll production strategy. And when Cu is heated, its grain size increases from microns to millimeters, a step that lowers graphene's resistivity, [a measure of how strongly a material opposes the flow of electric current] Hong argues, by reducing the number of electron-scattering grain boundaries [electron deflection that occurs at the interface between two grains in a polycrystalline material] that form in it.

According to Ruoff, during growth at 1000°C, close to Cu's melting point, carbon atoms nucleate at various sites across the surface and grow into 2D islands whose honeycomb lattice structures eventually merge, most likely in random orientations. As both materials cool, their mismatch in thermal- expansion coefficient causes the graphene sheet to severely wrinkle to relieve the stress caused by Cu's greater contraction. The sheet can also develop nanoscopic cracks when it's transferred to a flexible target substrate in the last step of the team's fabrication process.

Unless engineered otherwise—cut into ribbons, for instance, or deliberately strained to alter its band structure—graphene is a zero-bandgap semiconductor. Exposure to a strong Cu etchant such as iron chloride naturally dopes the graphene with holes. But to further increase the charge-carrier density, and thus the conductivity of its films, the SKKU group stacked together four separately grown graphene monolayers, each hole-doped again using nitric acid in the same production process. Unlike in graphite, the hexagonal lattices of adjacent stacked graphene layers are randomly oriented, and the overall conductivity in the graphene film appears to be proportional to the number of stacked layers. Those layers, moreover, may also provide additional conductive channels that bridge the gap between any cracks.

The carrier mobility of the SKKU single-layer films measured about 5000 cm2/V·s at room temperature—close to that of mechanically cleaved graphene. That and the group's observation of a half-integer quantum Hall effect [the Hall effect is the production of a voltage difference across an electrical conductor, transverse to an electric current in the conductor and a magnetic field perpendicular to the current] in graphene, Hong says, are signatures of the films' high quality. Even so, several research groups are working to resolve ambiguities in the 2D growth process and to understand the influence of graphene's defects on its electron-transport properties.

Geim remains enthusiastic. "Don't be surprised," he says, "if your next mobile phone has a touch screen and an LED light, both containing graphene electrodes."

References

[1] A. K. Geim, Science 324, 1530 (2009) [MEDLINE]; Y. Zhu et al., Adv. Mater. (in press), doi:10.1002/adma.201001068.

[2] Q. Yu et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 113103 (2008) [SPIN]; A. Reina et al., Nano Lett. 9, 30 (2009) [MEDLINE]; K. S. Kim et al., Nature 457, 706 (2009) [MEDLINE].

[3] X. Li et al., Science 324, 1312 (2009) [MEDLINE]; see also X. Li et al., Nano Lett. 9, 4359 (2009) [MEDLINE].

[4] S. Bae et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. (in press), doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.132.


Back to previous page

Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict